Current:Home > InvestDelete a background? Easy. Smooth out a face? Seamless. Digital photo manipulation is now mainstream -PrimeFinance
Delete a background? Easy. Smooth out a face? Seamless. Digital photo manipulation is now mainstream
View
Date:2025-04-19 11:39:30
NEW YORK (AP) — It’s been a common refrain when seeking proof that someone’s story or some event actually took place: “Pics, or it didn’t happen.”
But in a world where the spread of technology makes photo manipulation as easy as a tap on your phone, the idea that a visual image is an absolute truth is as outdated as the daguerreotype. And a photo can sometimes raise as many questions as it was meant to answer.
That was seen in recent days when controversy descended upon an image of Kate, Princess of Wales, and her three children. News agencies including The Associated Press published, then retracted, the image given out by Kensington Palace over concerns it had been manipulated, leading to Kate saying on social media that she occasionally “experimented” with photo editing.
In that, she’s hardly alone.
From something that was time-consuming and required a great deal of technical expertise in the days of actual film and darkrooms, digital editing has become something practically anyone can do, from adding filters to cropping images and much more. Apps abound, offering the easiest of experiences in creating and retouching photos and videos which can then be easily transmitted online and through social media.
“Cover blemishes and let the real you shine through,” says an ad for the smartphone app Facetune. “Remove and change backgrounds instantly,” the Fotor app’s website enthuses. “Our AI object remover is ready to assist you in getting rid of unwanted objects.”
This Wild West of image-altering abilities is opening new frontiers for everyday people — and creating headaches for those who expect photos to be a documentary representation of reality.
THE MAINSTREAMING OF MANIPULATION
Photojournalists and major news organizations follow standards and ethics codes around photos. These organizations typically place an absolute premium on image authenticity and reject photographs that have been altered in any way. But efforts to identify altered imagery can be impeded by the increasingly easy-to-use apps for phones and computers that allow anyone to chip away, piece by piece, at what a camera actually recorded.
The mainstreaming of manipulation, placing such abilities at people’s fingertips, has made for some interesting and viral moments — like the one in March 2023 when an artificially generated image of Pope Francis wearing a puffy white coat took in many people who thought it was real.
But there are risks and dangers to a world where just because you see something doesn’t mean you can absolutely believe it, said Ken Light, a photojournalism professor at the University of California Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism.
“The role of photography has been to witness and to record for the moment, but also for history. And I don’t think any of us know where it’s going,” he said. The rise of visual manipulation that casts doubt on whether something is real or not “frays the fabric of the culture tremendously in the moment but also for the future.”
Fred Ritchin, dean emeritus of the school at the International Center of Photography and a former picture editor at The New York Times Magazine, agreed. “‘The camera never lies’ is a 20th-century idea. It’s not a 21st-century idea,” he said. “These are all mythologies that we’re still hiding behind and we have not really confronted.”
People have long known that some images are manipulated, like cover models on magazines, and some have raised concerns about that impact that artificial and manipulated standards of beauty can have on girls and women.
But they haven’t really come to terms with how widespread digital manipulation is in other areas like social media, done by a wide variety of everyday people, said Lexie Kite, who with her sister Lindsay has done research into body image and media and wrote “More Than A Body: Your Body Is an Instrument, Not an Ornament.”
“It is important for all of us to anchor ourselves in the truth that digital manipulation is our reality,” she said.
HOW CAN FAKERY BE IDENTIFIED?
People can take steps to deal with the creeping effects of photo manipulation, said Hany Farid, a professor at UC Berkeley whose research examines digital forensics and image analysis.
Viewers need “to just slow down a little bit, be a little bit more careful, be a little more thoughtful” about what they’re looking at instead of just assuming any image they see is fact, he said.
On the technology side, he said there are ways being developed to track visual images and to make it clear if they’ve been altered after the photos were taken.
But while such steps may mitigate some of the issues, he said, it won’t eliminate the problem or take us back to where we could have abiding faith in an image, as previous generations did with photos we now consider unforgettable.
“Almost every major incident in our history, wars, conflicts, disasters, there’s this iconic photo,” he said. “They’re so powerful because they capture this incredibly complex set of facts and emotions and history in one photo. And I don’t know that we can have that anymore. It’s a very different world going forward now.”
Or, if the adage was modified: “Pics, and maybe it still didn’t quite happen.” ___
This story has been corrected to show that the image of the Princess of Wales and her children was given out by Kensington Palace, not Buckingham Palace.
veryGood! (84)
Related
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Beachgoer fatally struck by police truck on South Carolina beach, highway patrol says
- Tyson Foods suspends company heir, CFO John R. Tyson after arrest for intoxication
- These 5 U.S. cities have been hit hardest by inflation
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Trevor Lawrence agrees to $275 million extension with Jacksonville Jaguars
- Book called Ban This Book is now banned in Florida. Its author has this to say about the irony.
- Brittany Mahomes Shares Glimpse Into Workout Progress After Fracturing Her Back
- Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
- Brittany Mahomes Sizzles in Red-Hot Fringe Gown at Super Bowl Ring Ceremony
Ranking
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Alex Jones could lose his Infowars platform to pay for Sandy Hook conspiracy lawsuit
- Trump once defied the NRA to ban bump stocks. He now says he ‘did nothing’ to restrict guns
- 6 suspected poachers arrested over killing of 26 endangered Javan rhinos
- North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
- Illinois is hit with cicada chaos. This is what it’s like to see, hear and feel billions of bugs
- New initiative tests nonpartisan observation in Missoula primary
- Shoppers Say This Peter Thomas Roth Serum Makes Them Look Younger in 2 Days & It’s 60% off Right Now
Recommendation
Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
Katie Holmes Debuts Subtle, Yet Striking Hair Transformation
Missing Bonnaroo 2024? See full livestream schedule, where to stream the festival live
The definitive ranking of all 28 Pixar movies (including 'Inside Out 2')
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Trump once defied the NRA to ban bump stocks. He now says he ‘did nothing’ to restrict guns
The FAA and NTSB are investigating an unusual rolling motion of a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 Max
Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 Max goes into Dutch roll during Phoenix-to-Oakland flight